<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vytorin Recall &#187; New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Suffolk County NY sues for return of Vytorin money</title>
		<link>http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/news/2008/07/30/suffolk-county-ny-sues-for-return-of-vytorin-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/news/2008/07/30/suffolk-county-ny-sues-for-return-of-vytorin-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Niland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vytorin Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arterial plaque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENHANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schering-Plough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suffolk County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vytorin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zetia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suffolk County, New York, officials are seeking to recover public funds spent on Vytorin prescriptions for its employees. The county contends that defendants Merck and Schering-Plough delayed releasing the results of the ENHANCE trial, which indicated Vytorin to be ineffective and in some cases inferior in reducing the growth of fatty arterial plaque than generic [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com">Vytorin Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/news/2008/07/30/suffolk-county-ny-sues-for-return-of-vytorin-money/">Suffolk County NY sues for return of Vytorin money</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Suffolk County</strong>, New York, officials are seeking to recover public funds spent on <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/vytorin/" title="" rel="external">Vytorin</a> prescriptions for its employees. The county contends that defendants <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a></strong> and <strong>Schering-Plough</strong> delayed releasing the results of the <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/enhance/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ENHANCE">ENHANCE</a> trial, which indicated <strong>Vytorin</strong> to be ineffective and in some cases inferior in reducing the growth of fatty arterial plaque than generic <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/statins/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with statins">statins</a> alone. From April 2006 to mid-January of 2008, <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a></strong> and <strong>Schering-Plough</strong> withheld the <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/enhance/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ENHANCE">ENHANCE</a> trial results while they continued to aggressively advertise <strong>Vytorin</strong>.<span id="more-375"></span></p>
<p><strong>Suffolk County</strong> joins Congress and a growing number of individuals and municipalities in claiming it had been ripped off by the pharmaceutical giants. <strong>Suffolk County’s</strong> case states that <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a></strong> and <strong>Schering-Plough</strong> engaged in a “scheme … calculated to ensure that Plaintiff would pay for <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/zetia/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Zetia">Zetia</a></strong> and <strong>Vytorin</strong> despite cheaper and effective alternatives.</p>
<p>However, <strong>Suffolk County</strong> has added a little more heft to its <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/lawsuit/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with lawsuit">lawsuit</a> than other similar suits filed against the drug companies. On page 25 of the deposition, <strong>Suffolk County</strong> claims:</p>
<p>“Defendants have conducted and participated in the affairs of the Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity that includes <strong>acts indictable</strong> under 18 U.S.C. ++ 1341 and 1342 (mail and wire fraud) …”</p>
<p>Confusion and outrage have surrounded the <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/enhance/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ENHANCE">ENHANCE</a> trial results and the way in which <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a></strong> and <strong>Schering-Plough</strong> officials released the results, sparking Congress to launch an investigation. The Suffolk <strong>County</strong> <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/lawsuit/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with lawsuit">lawsuit</a>, however, goes further than just accusing the companies of negligence; it claims the companies may have acted criminally. In this <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/lawsuit/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with lawsuit">lawsuit</a> we see phrases indicating some serious charges:</p>
<p>“…<strong>concealing</strong> from Plaintiff and physicians, and the public the results of the <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/enhance/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ENHANCE">ENHANCE</a> study …”</p>
<p>“… deliberately misrepresenting the efficacy of <strong><a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/tag/zetia/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Zetia">Zetia</a></strong> and <strong>Vytorin</strong> …”</p>
<p>“publishing or causing to have published materials containing <strong>false information</strong> …”</p>
<p>“… pattern of <strong>racketeering</strong> activity …”</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com">Vytorin Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/news/2008/07/30/suffolk-county-ny-sues-for-return-of-vytorin-money/">Suffolk County NY sues for return of Vytorin money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vytorin-lawyer.com/news/2008/07/30/suffolk-county-ny-sues-for-return-of-vytorin-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

